I've been pondering yesterday and today about the roll that blogs such as this one could play in the future sharing of information on modelling NZR prototypes. This is part of the whole wider discussion that continues on the Willbly-Wobbly-Wooo about blogging's place in current journalism etc.
As the only real prolific blogger in this field in the country what are my thoughts? Mainly that I see pluses and minuses to the whole thing. The pluses are that its easier to communicate information in real time. An evening at the bench with photo's can be communicated in 15 minutes, with as many pictures as you like. Problems and successes are delivered as they happen. Random useful tips for others can be explained.
Contrast this with a magazine (I'll lump them all in together, they have not really changed format since the mid 70's). the Articles are more thoughtfully composed and laid out. due to space constraints there are not as many photo's to illustrate the process. Some of the spontaneity is lost, and some of the stuff ups can get lost (would anyone admit in an article that they had superglued a Dx to their pants, or washed their paintbrush in their glass of pinot noir?).
In their favor, magazines do not require a power source and can be read anywhere, and I do love them for that.
Another thing would be writing styles. To write and article is reasonable formulamatic. I wanted to make a model of this, therefore I found a plan and some photo's, then made the model doing this, this and this along the way, and here's how it looks now its finished. This structure is not a bad thing as with a tiny bit of assistance anyone can write an article. Writing for a blog, there's virtually no filters short of the ones between your brain and the keyboard. Its free form, the are no set formulas other than a heading. Marshaling ones thoughts into a semi-coherent stream of text is actually reasonable hard to do. I've had written blog posts that I've tried to write, written 4-5 paragraphs but just tossed the lot as I was rambling and couldn't remember what my point was when I started. This leads to the most important thing; is what you are writing about of interest to others?
In the 11 odd months I've been writing this thing, I've also found that its handy to have a couple of mates to fill in when you are just not in the right frame of mind to do anything. Darryl and Evan have both stepped up to the late at odd times with very well written articles ( I wish I could write 1/2 as well as Darryl, I'd write novels) for which I've been quite thankful for. Also those who with a bit of badgering have shown what their current projects are to a wider variety of people.
So where to from here. I've been thinking about whether a specialised forum would work (something like www.rmweb.co.uk). My current thinking suggests possibly not. Another possibility I had been mulling would be to get the local group together and get them to write a short article every month or so about what they have been doing. Case in point would be the write ups in the journal about the Chch and Wairarapa groups meeting, but with some more pictures of the models and how they were made. I can read that 'Fairfax Snodgrass turned up with a delightful model of ...', but it would be nice to see a picture or 2 of these little gems to inspire the rest of us to have a go. The space limitations of a magazine mean it will realistcally never happen.
The biggest risk of all from blogging is that if we spend all our time writing and reading everyone else's, there will be no time left for modeling.
comments on the back of a postage stamp in large letters please.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I like this blog over almost any forum that I know of, and most magazines, mainly because it’s moderated, timely and interesting.
The real positive of moderation (Rhys being the filter for postings) is that it’s (obviously) not a free for all, and thus maintains a focused relevance to NZ120 modelers. If it was a forum, I have no doubt that it would quickly turn into all the other Yahoo Groups – a spittoon for news articles, political views, train crashes and messages that state “Ha, good one” (with the qualification that I can’t comment on the NZ120 Yahoo group because I can’t see the messages unless I’m a member, so I have no idea if it’s worth joining or not).
Moderation has a perceived negative in that there are probably people who want to contribute, but don’t because they are afraid of the troll that keeps the gate. One thing I like about MD is Rhys’ maintenance of a tone such that nothing that might forward NZ120 would be turned away. After all, any hobby should first and foremost be about enjoyment. If there are people out there who have painted a Japanese wagon up to look like an LC or a KP or something, I’ll bet there would be plenty of people interested in the model numbers and what paint shades you used. Everyone is looking for an easier way. Seriously. Send it in.
Magazines have their place – plans, high quality showcase pictures, in-depth articles etc, but I do like timeliness of this over magazines – its quick and easy to catch up on the postings every few days, much easier than wading through 20 pages of pointless TranzRailPhotographers messages for one gem of information or waiting a whole month for an issue of Trains covering the Circus Trains of 1855.
Lastly, and most importantly, I do find the postings interesting. And not just mine. Even though I have no real interest in modeling NZR in the 1960s, the yard plans, prototype info, modeling techniques and the models themselves get me going and because it’s all NZ120, its relevant and even dare I say, stimulating.
And with the small size and geographic-spread that is the NZ120 modeling base, I think that is one of the best things this blog can do – stimulate: create a sense of community and culture (that’s entirely the wrong word!) for NZ120.
Hell, I’m almost tempted to build a railcar now.
This blog is the best thing to happen to the scale for quite a while. Inspiration and stimulation in abundance. Be nice to see more posts and contributions by others to give the Head Druff a break though.
Darryl - don't bother joining the NZ120 Yahoo group. It basicly lacks all that you'll find here.
No sense of community, and definately no culture.
Valid point about the time spent at the PC though.
I'm getting up early to put a few hours in at the modelling desk, and invariably find myself at the bLog desk....
I think that print media still has an important role to play, and that is to make sure that important information is available to future generations, almost in an archive fashion. Although blog and forum posts gain points for being immediate, within 3 years it may be impossible to find them as they get swallowed up in the every growing pile of information. Already googling for some terms return results in the millions, and most of the ones at the top of the heap have been manipulated and are commercially driven. The print media also gains point for being a living record of the times they were printed in….pickup any old journal while looking for an article and you are also subjected to adds, letters, etc….who would know you used to be able to buy a Hunslet DSA kit unless you looked through the adds in an issue?
Blogs and forums win out by being interactive with their audience; a few knowledgeable people can soon have a discussion and project humming along. Idiots can ruin that, however, a fact Kiwibonds has alluded to (all the "Yes, I agree" posts). Any discussion carried out over the "Letters to the Editor" column can take months to conclude as well as having a project being completed when a vital kernel of information turns up.
In conclusion, it really is horses for courses…..I'd rather read a magazine while on a plane or bus, but I enjoy the feeling of being part of a community when I participate in a blog or forum, rather than being "preached at" by a faceless corporation with no real right of reply.
Post a Comment