Well, I’ve been asked to muse on topics, but no ones really added a topic.
I guess the big ones are layout design and planning. Its been done to death everywhere else around the world, but it doesn’t seem to get mentioned in this country. Maybe because the hobby is dominated by S scale, to which the layout planning reply is ‘well, I’ll model a small country station, but have all these loco’s turning up’. So, how does one plan a layout where you can actually model stretches of the main line in a reasonable space, or rather, what does one model. One possibility is a stretch of line, with or without a station, with interesting scenery or terrain. Actual layout examples of this would be Gary Gloags model of the Manawatu gorge, or Cass. Why this may seem to be simple, there s something to be said for a layout with a minimal number of points and complication. Its very simple to operate. Trains can just be left for hours to wander through the scene while one does something else, like talk to punters, or indulge in a bit of reading at home. And the maintenance of the whole mechanical side is much easier too, which should be a major consideration. Another option is to model a junction of some description, or major rural station (Otaki). this gives more options as trains can wander through, or stop and indulge in a bit of shunting. For some odd reason this is a real crowd stopper at exhibitions. I once kept a crowd ( well, group) of punters entertained fro 15 minutes buy shuffling the same rake of wagons from 1 siding to another. maybe they were waiting for it to stall? Finally there is the high maintenance but extremely operationally interesting stations where the engines are changed (Otira, Arthurs pass, Paikakariki). This involves allot of operation for a home layout, and an exhausting amount for an exhibition layout, with only a railcar to rescue the worn out operators.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
That's something I've always wanted to see done at exhibitions - shunting. Average Joe Punter must get sick of seeing trains running in circles.
Topic/muse suggestion:
The evolution of a scale: A consise history of NZ120 according to Rhys.
Hmm, might struggle with the consise bit...
I think the shunting appeals more to 'us' than 'them'. I reckon Joe Punter with his sprogs at an exhibition likes to see a variety of trains flowing through (ideally) spectacular-ish scenes he can recognise and then say "hey look little Jimmy - that's the train you took last month/saw this morning/that's where Nanna has her P lab" etc. When there is a long gap in the trainaction, they move on to the next layout, but if there is interest in the scene (locale familiarity, clever detail, animation, humour) they might stay a while longer for the next one. Although Otaki to Cass evolved without a huge amount of thought (certainly from this end); by chance it ended up with a lot of these characteristics and seemed to be at least moderately successful for both 'us' and 'them'. I started building a Wellington layout that I must find piccies from...
My opinion on shunting: Fun in larger scales, but a pain in the butt for smaller ones. You need VERY reliable locos that run well at creep speeds so you don't have to nudge them every few minutes, immaculate electrical pickup over pointwork, remotly operated points and remote uncoupling.
I've been doing american N for the last couple of years with carefully laid track, nicely running MU'd locos and perfectly weighted wagons with pure microtrains couplers - but I usually 0-5-0 everything. Now add handbuilt NZ120 locos and wagons with random coupling heights, uneven weights and random tracking characteristics... Sn3.5 is the way to go for shunting until Kadee starts making chopper couplings in 9mm.
Post a Comment